The three essential things to avoid talking about – even with close friends – are undoubtedly religion, politics and the royalty. Views can become polarised rather quickly, friendships strained or broken. So let me ignore my own advice…
This week see’s a bit of a “perfect storm” (stupid phrase BTW) – politics, religion and royalty all more in the news than ever.
I got my voting papers in for the Scottish Parliament. Keen to ensure I didn’t miss the deadline (though the sealed envelope still waits for posting) I set about the task of ticking three boxes. Favorite MSP…. well that’s easy, you simply knock off the nut bars and loons and then decide who of the few remaining candidates you loath least. Next favorite party…. equally easy, you simply knock off the nut bars and loons and then decide who of the few remaining parties you loath least.
Next the Alternative Vote – yip I’d definitely like an alternative to voting – but I couldn’t find an option for apathy, anarchy or revolution. So AV or First Past the Post? Easy in the end – I’ve never liked the idea of condoning a single politician or party so the idea of saying I like theses folk in order of least loathing appeals. I’d prefer if I didn’t have to say 5 up to 1 though. I’d rather have it numbered 10 up to 5 – lets not give the impression to our politicians that we actually favour their politicing in any meaningful anyway.
So that’s politics out the way – now religion.
Religion in Scotland is tricky (just like any other country) – but in Scotland it’s confused and mixed up with the countries two leading Football Clubs – thats a shame. At a time when we are obliged to consider who governs the country and who will lead us to the promised land of economic recovery our headlines are instead dominated by deep rooted, historical, religous problems. Shameful. This football season has sounded more like a discourse on religious tensions than the reporting of 22 guys (mainly foreigners) chasing a ball to decide which Glasgow based football team will win a football league. Shameful – count me out.
So Royalty. A Wedding approaches – best of luck Kate, hope it works out ok for you. Personally I’ll be doing my best to avoid the gooey eyed BBC presenters coo-ing and aw-ing at the pretty couple. But best of luck to the pair of you. And best of luck defending the right of the Monarchy to behave like the Monarchy. I don’t often (in fact never) agree with David Starkey – but I agreed with the first few paragraphs of his Sunday Times piece that I read (before on principle I stopped reading because I started to agree with him). Succession is a male thing – but is coming under pressure to be a matter of equality - a first born girl would be the heir to the throne . That sounds fair enough – but this is the monarchy - it doesn’t live by any normal behavioural patterns – if it did succession wouldn’t be based on right of birth at all. And then there is the rather crazy notion that the Queen abdicates and Charles steps aside to let William gain the throne. Complete nonsense – this isn’t AV and it isn’t First Past the Post – it’s the monarchy. If the Royal Family were to start opting in or out of the duty imposed on them at birth the institution of monarchy would crumble pretty quickly - and quite understandably I don’t see that being an ambition of any of them any time soon.
There is though a rather more important Royal question that we tend to hide from – it seems the heir to the throne can’t marry a Roman Catholic. Undoubtedly a question that our Politicians would rather not have to think about, debate or address. Politics, Religion and Royalty - no wonder we tend to avoid talking about them with friends. So lets just tick the ballot papers in secret and wave the Union Jack at the happy couple – it’s a lot simpler.